Skip to main content

Do you have the resources to perform acts of kindness?

Last week, I found myself sitting in a fancy boardroom in midtown Manhattan. A group of about twenty well-dressed white men and two women were meeting with me to discuss matters of corporate strategy, for the nonprofit healthcare system I am consulting with.

As we talked through anticipated state budget cuts to Medicaid and the difficulty of serving that program, I gazed out the window from time to time. Thirty-five stories below us, we could find the people who would be impacted by these decisions. Sure, this was only one nonprofit healthcare system among many. But collectively, we represented the decision makers, and others had to live by our decisions. There was no Medicaid recipient who would speak up for the program; there was no elderly person living in one of the organization's nursing homes would lend their perspective; there was no person from a homeless shelter who could say what they needed, what would help their situation most.

It was seven o'clock in the evening, and we were sipping sparkling water and nibbling on canapes and chicken skewers. The people who this nonprofit healthcare organization served - or could potentially serve - were certainly not having an experience like this. And little were they aware that we were discussing the future of their care.

In nonprofit healthcare organizations, it is typical to have a board composed of professionals who are donors or otherwise well-connected in their industries. They are usually non-experts in healthcare, but are charged with making decisions about what lines of business are served - in other words, who gets care or doesn't get care delivered by the organization in question. And in this case, the board for this particular nonprofit was grappling with financial insecurity - what consultants like to call a "burning platform." It was not sustainable to continue on the path that the organization was on; too much money was being lost due to state reimbursement cuts to Medicaid.

So what resources were needed to do the right thing and to continue to serve the Medicaid population?

As we discussed this issue, one of the board members surprised me by quoting an academic named Edward Tufte:
It is straightforward for me to be ethical, responsible, and kind-hearted because I have the resources to support that.
I was blown away by the implications of this statement.

Yes, I thought, exactly! Everyone here around this table, right now, has the resources to support being ethical, responsible, and kind-hearted. Yet the implication that this well-heeled lawyer was drawing was the exact opposite. He was implying that the nonprofit healthcare organization did not have the current resources to serve these needy populations, and we had to shore up those resources first and get on sound financial footing before we could pursue that goal.

And what are the resources required for us to pursue the right thing on a personal level? Do we need to have more before we can act? If we always think we need more in order to do the right thing, where does that leave us?

Individually and collectively, we must do more for each other. We must think that we have the current resources to support acting in grace and kindness. Otherwise we'll never get there.


Anonymous said…
Great thought-provoking post! At first I feel like the guy is going for a cop-out, but then the more I think about it; it makes sense. Scarcity of resources forces us to make decisions that, in the end, prioritize some actions over others. Thanks for the sneak peak into a board room.
EMP said…
Thanks for the reply, my friend! I think that's exactly where the ambiguity lies - in the notion of whether there is scarcity, and when there is, what the best use of resources would be. But I also think that for the organization I'm consulting with, that there is a perception of scarcity that might be used as a scare tactic at times. And that's a way that positive impacts get dampened over time.
Unknown said…
Wonderfully thought provoking piece, Emily, thanks for sharing! I appreciate reading your reflections at the intersection of kindness/faith and your work life, as I often find that intersection a fruitful & interesting place. The question this has me mulling over now is how we direct even a limited set of resources toward powering kindness & generosity. Good to remember to check in with & recharge our resources from time to time too to best enable that outward facing work. Looking forward to reading more!

Popular posts from this blog

All I want for my birthday is...

Have you ever had a bad day turn around because of incredibly small, yet memorable, act of kindness? Maybe a stranger smiled at you in the grocery line, or opened a door for you, or let you go first after a stop sign. Or perhaps you heard from an old friend, calling you just because. A hug, a genuine question about your day, or simply the gift of listening -- all of these acts have power. Rabbi Hillel* famously said, "If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am not for others, what am I? And if not now, when?" There's so much that can be read into a quote like that, but let me offer this interpretation through the lens of kindness. Performing kindness (e.g. self-care) for yourself is a genuine form of kindness for the world. And likewise, acting in kindness for others is also a boon to one's own soul. In that spirit, I offer this request. All I want for my birthday (Oct 23) this year is to put a dose of kindness into the world. And I need your help. If

Equal and opposite reactions

Push and pull. Up and down. Back and forth. How often have we felt this type of dynamic? In conversation, in relationships, in our lives, and in everyday interactions, there's a give and a get. In both positive and negative ways, we respond to each other. We give hugs when we get hugs. We approach others who seem like they are friendly already. We call those who call us back. We give a kind word when we get one. Virtuous cycles beget more virtuous cycles. And on the non-virtuous side of cycles? Well, he did it first, didn't he? Or we say, "it's because she did that, that I told her off." We say "you're welcome" to "thank you," and get pissed off when one of those niceties isn't returned. Newton's third law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. In scientific terms, this means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on any two objects that are interacting. The size of the for